r/twinpeaks • u/cyberbela • 8h ago
Season 2 Never knew about that (?)
I'm reading the diary of Laura Palmer and found this page, honestly I never have thought this about Josie just from watching her in the series. We know how much Truman suffered for Josie in the show, imagine if he knew about this...
66
62
54
u/TrasseTheTarrasque 8h ago
How is one paragraph of Book Josie somehow more interesting than two seasons of Show Josie?
33
u/Solo_Polyphony 7h ago
Because Joan Chen is one of those misfires inevitable in the Lynch casting process (that is, pretty faces).
Isabella Rossellini would’ve brought considerably more darkness and predatory sexuality to the character.
38
u/notafanofmaluma 7h ago edited 7h ago
I think Joan was chosen precisely because she brought that soapy quality to her acting. Plus, the point of the character is that she was constantly revealed to be two-faced and with a secret agenda -right until her final episode.
19
u/TrasseTheTarrasque 7h ago
Honestly reading that diary entry is kind of eye-opening. Why is she taking English lessons with Laura when she either doesn't need them or doesn't bother improving?
Seems like there could be a Judy connection (I know there was supposed to be a different original idea for Judy that heavily involves Josie, but I'm imagining Judy as she exists in The Return).
What if Judy was using Josie to actively mess with Laura, keep law enforcement distracted, and then deal with Cooper? Whether Josie was possessed or a tulpa or something I dunno.
Tulpas we see in The Return do have that same kind of cartoonishness about them. And it would work with her eventual weird fate.
6
u/notafanofmaluma 7h ago
You have a very good point! Josie generally doesn't make a lot of sense. Who's she aligning whith at any given point? Why would she put herself at risk so much? Given her background, it makes sense she tends to go for the survivalist route, but man does she do bizarre things. Maybe she was always meant to be an entity from the Black Lodge; after all, she's the only person who dies and gets trapped elsewhere apart from Log Lady's husband (whom is implied to have some form of spititual powers) and Major Briggs (who had contact with the Lodge and was used by it in order to talk to Coop). And, of course, Coop himself.
6
u/TrasseTheTarrasque 6h ago edited 6h ago
Also she just so happens to be dating a guy who shares his name with the President who authorized dropping the nukes
Edit: I also feel like Windom Earle has a similar vibe. Like he doesn't act or think like a real person, and he goes out the same way as Original Dougie and Mr. C. And he just randomly showed up in the middle of the woods where Bob was presumably lying low for like 5 episodes.
27
u/TrasseTheTarrasque 7h ago
I don't even know if the casting was the issue. The way the character was written just seemed so passive (even while doing decidedly active things)
32
u/Hot-Jelly-4439 8h ago
Was it intentional to mention Josie (who is Chinese) on June 4, 1989???? The date of the Tian'anmen Square massacre.
7
u/ultimomono 5h ago edited 5h ago
I was just going to say the same. It has to be intentional. That date at that time was burned into our memories. Josie was from China via Hong Kong. Laura's death was February 1989 in the series--not sure why the diary has her living longer
•
u/EbmocwenHsimah 50m ago
I think it’s as simple as a dating inconsistency. I think the book’s running off the assumption that Laura died in early 1990, when the show aired, instead of 1989, when they shot the pilot episode.
7
u/TheAbsurderer 7h ago
What do you mean? Josie tells Truman about her past in the show, and Cooper also tells him about it after Josie dies.
23
u/jrg320 7h ago
I think OP is referring to Josie attempting to seduce Laura, or at least being creepy with her.
11
u/cyberbela 7h ago
Yes, exactly this. At the end of the day, laura was sixteen in this entry, that's very gross from Josie.
2
u/Slight_Cat_3146 4h ago
They are both experiencing hypersexuality which can be a and is a fairly common trauma response of protracted sexual abuse. It is consistent with her background to be predatory sexually.
14
u/SeeBriRun 7h ago
I never had a problem believing in the seduction - if Josie were going to make a play for Laura, this is probably how she would go about it - but I still don't know why Josie would try to seduce Laura. I doubt it's just for fun.
If Josie knows about Laura's secret nocturnal life, then she most likely heard about her from Ben Horne, right? So is this a plan she hatched with him - or some sort of contingency plan against him?
3
9
u/BlueRoseBrighton 5h ago
Alright, let me overthink this…
Josie speaks perfect English. She pretends she doesn’t as part of her act of vulnerability in front of Catherine and Pete and Harry and whoever to make them underestimate her.
Who set up the lessons? Josie herself? How did that arrangement come about? Who told her about Laura and her role as a tutor? Perhaps Ben, because she tutors/cares for Johnny.
How does Laura know about Josie’s past? Is it possible Josie volunteered this information? Why? Is it because she can see Laura is similar to her? Did Ben tell Laura about Josies past? Why? How does Laura know about Josie’s secret relationship with Harry? Only Josie could have told her that. But why would she do so? Because she wants Laura to share a secret also?
We know we can’t trust Laura’s perception of things. She’s traumatised, high, and sleep deprived. Laura thinks she has a kind of sexual magnetism that people can’t resist, but I think in reality, manipulative people like Ben and Josie see Laura for what she is: Pretty, and damaged, and meat for their appetites.
There’s a possibility that (if these English lessons ever even really happened) that Josie sensed something up with Laura, and maybe even wanted to help - but didn’t want to blow her cover. That would be why she asks about Bobby. It’s not an attempt at seduction, it’s curiosity. Maybe Josie makes insinuations about her sexual activity because she worries for Laura’s safety.
…to what end? I don’t know.
Anyway, thanks for coming go to my TED talk.
6
u/divinebettiepage 4h ago
I agree with you that Josie speaks perfect English. This is shown when she’s talking to the man who comes to fetch her for Thomas Eckhart and then again when Eckhart shows up. There was a thrown-out story line that Josie was Judy’s sister and had lodge connections, and she does seem to enjoy manipulating people. But also Laura DID have a magnetism that people couldn’t resist. Some sexualized it. Others, like Donna and Maddy, were just drawn to it. There is plenty of canonical evidence that Laura did indeed have a psychological hold on everyone in the town.
Josie was bad news. No way she wanted to help Laura. I don’t know what her game was there, but it wasn’t good natured curiosity or sexual desire. Josie’s go-to move with everyone was seduction. Every time Harry asks her anything she doesn’t want to answer, she just says, “Ohhhh, Harry…” and starts running her fingers through his hair and he forgets what he was doing.
3
u/RobAChurch 3h ago
Laura really was in some ways like a modern sin-eater, like a beacon attracting everyone's darkness.
2
u/Nodack_ 5h ago
What book is this
3
u/soap_is_neat 4h ago
The Secret Diary of Laura Palmer, written by Jen Lynch! There’s an audiobook of it on YouTube narrated by Sheryl Lee, it’s great. Very, very sad and disturbing but it’s worth the listen if you want more of Laura’s perspective
1
u/Neither_Internal_261 2h ago
Josie was really the other evil in the show. I like her about as much as I like Leo.
-8
u/Owen_Hammer 8h ago
The fact that the timeline of “The Secret Diary” doesn’t align with, for lack of a better word, “canonical” Twin Peaks tells you everything you need to know. Remember that Laura was killed on February 23rd, 1989.
24
u/Calm_Public_615 8h ago
The diary was written with the understanding that Laura died in 1990 rather than in 1989. They didn't decide on 1989 as the year of her death until after the book's publication.
0
u/Owen_Hammer 4h ago
Not true. The pilot takes place on February 24th, 1989.
4
u/Calm_Public_615 4h ago
Yes, but then they go to 1990 in later episodes before finally coming back to 1989. Here.
1
u/Owen_Hammer 4h ago
Yeah, there are inconsistencies. The idea that the series takes place in 1990 was toyed with for a few episodes, but when they had to have the date be spoken (not written in a time when nobody paused frames) it was 1989.
21
u/Alreyleon 8h ago
I just think Jennifer Lynch didn't get the dates right because David and Mark Frost didn't develop the whole thing in so much detail as a modern series would, I don't think they cared about dates that much, and they weren't always around, both came and went, and came back. I just take Laura's words in the diary as her recollections and emotions, doesn't line up entirely in a rational way, more in an emotional way.
11
u/lavendermoonoracle 7h ago
This feels a little harsh...
9
u/Poerflip23 7h ago
Probably because it’s thinly veiled misogyny towards Jennifer lynch.
9
u/lavendermoonoracle 7h ago
Yeah, especially because Secret History and Final Dossier have inconsistencies as well and have still been received very positively by fans.
0
u/Owen_Hammer 4h ago
Fine, they've been received positively. I don't care. All I'm saying is that you absolutely cannot reconcile all these inconsistencies and people are interpreting it as some kind of attack. Stop being so defensive, everyone. It doesn't make for an environment where people can have a conversation.
1
u/lavendermoonoracle 3h ago
Wait so do you think all of the books are a different canon from the show/movie? I don't hate that theory necessarily, especially a story that has multiple timelines. I just didn't get that from your initial comment.
1
u/Owen_Hammer 3h ago
I do not have a holistic theory about all the inconsistencies. I am merely pointing out that the books and the TV show (and the movie) are inconsistent. That’s it. Lynch, Lynch, Frost et al didn’t have some master plan about multiple timelines. I can say that with certainty.
1
u/lavendermoonoracle 1h ago
My apologies. Your initial comment read to me that the secret diary was not canon because of timeline inconsistencies.
1
2
u/Owen_Hammer 4h ago
This criticism is wholly without merit. I didn't even criticize Jennifer Lynch. You just want to use the real problem of misogyny to attack me, someone you don't know who hasn't hurt you in any way.
2
u/VerminousScum 6h ago
Oh don't be ridiculous. The book was a fun companion piece for fans to promote the show. Also bear in mind that it is a "diary", and Laura is already a famously unreliable narrator. Neither David Lynch nor Mark Frost had much to do with it. Not to mention the show is ultimately non-linear itself and the dates (and everything else) are left in question. None of this has anything to do with misogyny.
1
u/Owen_Hammer 4h ago
Harsh? I'm not criticizing anyone. I'm just saying that you cannot reconcile the events of the book with the TV show.
4


218
u/MisogynyisaDisease 8h ago
Once you finish Twin Peaks as an entire unit, you realize that the vast majority of that town was inappropriate with Laura or outright ignored her suffering. She is basically a lightning rod for this type of behavior against underaged girls.
The only ones we can say for certain were decent people when Laura was alive (off the top of my head) were Sheriff Truman, Andy, Lucy, Hawk, Margaret/The Log Lady, James, Ed, and Donna's parents. Maybe Pete too.
Even the principal in the beginning, crying the way he was, ends up being called into question.