r/fusion • u/Sun_In_A_Bottle • 14d ago

Why fusion, over everything else?

$15.2 billion in private investment over the past 5 years!

For an industry that is projected to need 1 million workers by 2040, how is the global private workforce roughly ONLY 4,000?!

38 Upvotes

86% Upvoted

67 comments sorted by

View all comments

-4

u/x7_omega 14d ago

Some factors, perhaps not the strongest:

  1. Ignorant hope of "clean nuclear", even though even p-B11 is not aneutronic. At 1GW power, 0.2% in neutrons is quite an envy of a neutron source to have around.
  2. Ignorant hope of "cheap nuclear", even though the basis for a feasibility study does not exist yet.
  3. Ignorant rejection of fission as "dirty", though not baseless outside Russia with their fast reactors and soon to be closed nuclear cycle, but this factor kills the vibe. And your typical nuclear bro is the vibe variety of investor.

The question I would like to see asked to the nuclear bros community: why no one, not a single soul, even mentions pure He3 fusion? The only relevant completely aneutronic fusion reaction, and easier than p-B11.

5

u/Sad_Dimension423 14d ago

It's not easier than p-B11.

0

u/x7_omega 13d ago

Oh, really? A machine that does not have to be designed to survive megawatts in neutron flux for years, while operating reliably enough to make money, is not easier than a machine that does the same in neutron flux? Paper reactor designs have always been easier, but it is a different industry.

3

u/Sad_Dimension423 13d ago

Yes, really. Simply getting 3He to react sufficiently is harder than getting p-B11 to react. It's probably impossible in any practical way. That it would have fewer neutrons is irrelevant if you can never get to that.