r/askcarsales 1d ago

US Sale Dealership refusing to compensate for their negligence

Dealership is an absolute pain to deal with, I just want to know if I have a leg to stand on here or if I'm SOL. It's a minor bill ($500 including towing), but I feel like this isn't something I should have to deal with 300 miles after buying a car. Just looking for a second opinion, I don't care about the money, I can afford a $500 bill, but I'm just pissed about the situation.

Anyways here goes...

About two weeks ago, I purchased a used vehicle from a dealership. The vehicle was represented as being in proper working condition at the time of sale, passed their 10 point inspection. I purchased a 2023 Hyundai with 39,328 miles. I ran into this problem at 39,600 miles.

Shortly after purchase, I was away for several days. Upon returning, I discovered the vehicle’s engine oil was practically empty. Given the severity of the issue, the vehicle was immediately towed to an independent mechanic that I am familiar with and trust for inspection and repair.

The independent mechanic performed a full evaluation, cleaned the affected components, and identified the cause of the failure as an improperly installed or defective O-ring. The mechanic has documented the condition of the vehicle, the diagnosis, etc. I have photos and videos of the improperly installed o ring as well as how much oil leaked onto the bottom of my car that had to be cleaned.

Based on the timing of the failure, occurring within a week of purchase (only 300 miles) and the nature of the defect, the issue appears consistent with improper servicing or faulty installation existing at the time of sale or delivery (aka negligence).

The vehicle experienced a major loss of oil that, had it occurred while driving long distance, could have resulted in complete engine failure and left me stranded out of state. Thankfully when I went out of state my brother drove us in his car instead of taking mine (I purchased it on Tuesday and we left that Friday, got back Monday night).

I contacted the dealership to request coverage of the repair costs and associated expenses. The dealership has refused, stating that since the vehicle was not brought to them for service they are not required to compensate. I do not believe this is reasonable given the circumstances, the safety risk involved, and the need for independent diagnosis after a mechanical failure immediately following purchase as a result of their negligence.

0 Upvotes

56 comments sorted by

View all comments

8

u/DavefromCA Former Sales 1d ago

You left out the most important detail, was the car bought "as is?"

3

u/rick707 1d ago

To OP: this is a really shitty situation and you should factually (not emotionally) document your experience (keep it short and concise) on all review platforms.

Also, view this as a cheap (compared to what’s possible) lesson that you should NEVER buy a used car without a competent third party inspection as “as-is” means as-is

Here is a nice documentary about how As Is worksAS-IS

4

u/PopularGrapefruit150 1d ago

Acutally I just found it in the contract. It was not As-Is. Dealer Warranty, valid for 60 days or 3,000 miles.

4

u/rick707 1d ago

I’m glad you found that but the dealer warranty is not valid elsewhere. They should have at least done something for you, they clearly suck. Did your trusted guys inspection find anything else wrong? If so, go use whatever you can on the dealer warranty now.

1

u/PopularGrapefruit150 1d ago

Roger that, appreciate it! And no he didn’t. At the end of the day it’s a lesson learned. I also do really like the car, just not a fan of how they handled this.

2

u/DavefromCA Former Sales 1d ago

Well there you go! Great news! YAY! I am happy for you....we have to break so much bad news I am really happy you found that,

2

u/GatorWok 1d ago

That link is exactly what I was hoping it was. 😄 😄