r/SubredditDrama • u/[deleted] • May 21 '14
Crazier, more racist offshoot subreddit of TRP debates the empirical data supporting racial superiority. This whole subreddit... what?
[deleted]
21
May 21 '14
Oh wow. The other day on Mark Rosewater's blog (he is the lead designer of Magic: The Gathering) someone asked him:
If someone is using WoTC-copyrighted artwork in an objectionable way (Eg, to promote racism), is there someone we can contact at Wizards who might be amenable to sending those people a cease & desist?
And he replied:
Email me the specifics to the email link on my column and I’ll forward it to the correct people.
I was really curious when I saw the question. Of course it would be on reddit. :|
This subreddit's logo is ripped off Magic: The Gathering art.
9
2
u/Mitsubachijigoku May 23 '14
When Dark Enlightened Oracle enters the battlefield, look at the top two posts in your subreddit. Post one to your neo-nazi facebook group and throw the other in the trash.
"The secret to life is more racism."
73
u/Trollkarlen May 21 '14
If intelligence is a prerequisite to a stable, functional society and africans have a mean intelligence significantly lower than the average in other areas, then it is unlikely a functional society will form in Africa without outside intervention of a forceful nature (colonialism). So far said hypothesis seems pretty will demonstrated by facts.
The congo is a perfect example. The belgians left it in a very healthy and promising state when they left. It almost immediately decayed into anarchy. South Africa is another good example. The standard of living for the average black was higher under aparteid than it is today. South Africa has all the hallmarks of a society undergoing decay.
/r/Badhistory would have a field day with this post.
58
u/Arsenious May 21 '14
That's not even fun to refute, it's just blatantly false. The best badhistory is insidious; I've always thought this racist crap wasn't any fun. It just makes you angry.
20
u/2you4me 22nd century dudebro May 21 '14
Yeah, the Congo specifically was just short of genocide. It was on par with the trail of tears.
6
14
u/DrewRWx Heaven's GamerGate May 21 '14
Yeah, you really got to hand it to Belgians, they know how to make a show of force.
16
3
2
u/PugnacityD May 21 '14
I'm fairly certain the Belgian Congo is considered genocidal. And if it's not, it really should be.
19
u/pathein_mathein some arrogant forum layman May 21 '14
Technically, that topic is on moratorium this month, though DEers have come up in the past.
12
u/ProMarshmallo May 21 '14
I don't know weather I should be amused or seriously concerned that badhistory had to make posting harder for the community every month.
5
u/_watching why am i still on reddit May 21 '14
If you're really curious, IIRC the reasoning was part of an attempt to preemptively keep out of bad circlejerk territory. Of course BH is always gonna be jerky (thank god), but you have to have some way to keep every post from being "In atheismrebooted, DAE jesus dont real?!"
12
u/Canama uphold catgirlism May 21 '14
/r/badhistoryrebooted was literally made for this. It's like bizarro-/r/badhistory, where only the moratorium topics are allowed.
15
u/BulletproofJesus May 21 '14
Like this is history so bad it isn't even wrong. It's just imaginary history.
5
May 21 '14
The belgians left it in a very healthy and promising state when they left.
I dare any of them to go speak the praises of Leopold to someone living in the Congo today.
6
4
u/x757xSnarf May 21 '14
Hey... The Belgium Congo was a perfectly stable place.
They only cut of a few million hands because they wanted more rubber. It could have been worse
41
u/The_YoungWolf Everyone on Reddit is an SJW but you May 21 '14
You really can find anything on reddit. Even super-racist neo-monarchists.
Yup, democracy is so terrible. Just look at this terrible world we live in.
Also wut
The congo is a perfect example. The belgians left it in a very healthy and promising state when they left. It almost immediately decayed into anarchy.
Like wut
31
u/ControlRush It's about ethics in black/feminist/gypsy/native culture. May 21 '14
I don't know about you, but I'd just love to have my hand chopped off for not meeting quotas set by violent foreign invaders!
5
May 21 '14
To be fair this was the Free State of Congo, which even European leaders of the time thought was fucked up. The later government-run colony wasn't as bad.
It definitely wasn't "healthy" though.
12
u/deviden May 21 '14
The tribal conflicts in the FS of C arose from the myth that the Tutsi and Hutu peoples were opposed to each other throughout history, one side supposedly being a foreign invader hundreds of years before the Belgians and far worse to the subjugated majority.
The myth was created and taught to Hutus and Tutsis by the Belgian-built schools in Congo for generations as part of a larger "divide and rule" strategy.
Colonial legacy in action!
8
8
u/bushiz somethingawfuldotcom agent provocatuer May 21 '14
Consider that, for these people, 'healthy' is synonymous with 'genociding the natives'
-2
24
May 21 '14
[deleted]
19
u/Cersei_smiled May 21 '14
I am also sick of people using "weary" instead of "wary". It bugs me in a way I cannot adequately express and I see it used all the time.
10
14
2
u/patfav May 21 '14
I was always confused by how similar "toe the line" is to "tow the line", both being common and reasonable expressions.
But "tote the line" is definitely wrong.
1
May 21 '14
Is tow the line an expression?
1
u/patfav May 21 '14
Yes.
To "toe the line" is to approach a treshold without crossing it, ei: "Redpillers toe the line between rape and consensual sex."
To "tow the line" is to fall in line with a group and their beliefs, ei: "Republicans come down hard on members who don't tow the party line."
I think it's a sailing reference to operating as a team to work the lines of the sails and such.
2
May 21 '14
I think both examples are toe the line.
2
u/patfav May 21 '14
Really? I suppose I never looked deeply into it, but with the two different meanings it seems like a simple way to differentiate them.
"Toe" only refers to digits, or in this case as a verb suggesting moving those digits right to the edge of something.
"Tow" is to pull, which makes more sense when expressing commitment to a group. To "toe" the company line, to me sounds like stopping just short of the company line rather than agreeing with and espousing it.
2
May 21 '14
It means to conform to a rule or standard.
5
u/patfav May 21 '14
Yeah I checked some online resources and both seem to be acceptable but "toe" is more commonly used for both meanings.
So much for my sailing theory!
1
1
1
47
u/Thurgood_Marshall May 21 '14
Discoverer of DNA structure is a race realist
But Rosalind Franklin is dead. Women scientists who weren't given credit for their work in the house.
13
May 21 '14
Nor do we get to hear her views on the Irish.
11
u/Thurgood_Marshall May 21 '14
Considering Watson's mother was Irish and he's in the Irish America Hall of Fame, maybe he's trying to tell us he's a dingus.
-1
-22
u/Str8tuptrollin May 21 '14
Rosalind franklin is overrated, all she basically did was take a picture
23
May 21 '14
TIL that x-ray crystallography, especially in the 50s, was just taking pictures. And that she didn't have an unpublished paper that independently determined the structure of DNA and location of the phosphate groups. No, she wasn't the only person involved, but she was just as responsible as Watson and Crick.
→ More replies (4)
40
u/_watching why am i still on reddit May 21 '14 edited May 21 '14
Oh, you haven't heard of neoreactionaries? Yeah, they're basically a combination of every shitty tendency on reddit. Racist, sexist, and also monarchists. So... yes, they're really fucking stupid.
EDIT: Some resources for anyone confused:
12
u/ewbrower May 21 '14
Monarchists? That doesn't seem like something these weirdos would be drawn to.
13
May 21 '14
I don't know how they rationalize it, but they do. They're very anti-democracy (in any form) and pro-monarchy.
15
u/Kytescall May 21 '14
I don't know how they rationalize it, but they do.
It's simple, really.
You know how these libertarian/ancap types are all about extreme property rights? It's that. A monarch is just a private property owner on a large scale. A CEO of a geographic region.
Supposed obsession over "individual liberty" went full circle and found itself justifying a dictatorship as the ideal form of society and government.
5
May 21 '14
They're the only ones that see the truth and know what's good for everyone.
To quote Dr. Horrible:
The world is a mess and I just need to rule it.
4
1
7
May 21 '14
There's a monarchist bent to the Austrian school too, which is funny, considering the "an" in ancap.
4
u/tightdickplayer May 21 '14
ancaps aren't anarchists at all, they're dipshit libertarians that want a slightly more "fuck you mom" title. of course if ancaps knew a thing about political theory, they wouldn't be ancaps.
3
2
May 21 '14
A leader governs by the will of the constituents! It's his land and we voluntarily associate! there's no hypocrisy in our delusions whatsoever!
6
u/superiority smug grandstanding agendaposter May 21 '14
They're anti-democracy and pro-dictatorship. Therefore monarchists.
4
u/tightdickplayer May 21 '14
It makes perfect sense once you understand what's going on. These guys are clearly Smarter Than Everyone, right? That's why they're rejecting all the stuff society says they're supposed to accept and becoming all dark enlightened. So, Smarter Than Everyone means that things that most people believe must be pretty dumb, right? These sheeple love their feminism and their non-racism and all that dumb shit they're not smart enough to see through, and they also love democracy, soooo... clearly democracy is dumb!
3
3
u/Kytescall May 21 '14
It's the ironic ultimate conclusion of libertarian/ancap logic.
Property owners have absolute power over their property. CEOs have absolute power over their company. Therefore, if ultimately a private entity effectively takes control of a nation or city-state (as they will, because public entities would not exist), they too will have absolute power over it and the people within it.
A monarch is the ultimate libertarian, because he is simply the ultimate property owner. No one else gets to tell him what to do with or on his property.
1
May 21 '14
They start by advocating ultimate freedom, then realize what they'd desire most in that environment is the ultimate security. From anarchy to fascism, all in one swing.
2
u/mracidglee May 24 '14
None of your other respondents have actually read the source material. It's because a monarch might possibly be enlightened, and if he's not you can cure that with a guillotine, whereas a democracy winds up as tyranny by the proles, who are idiots and much harder to overthrow.
1
May 21 '14
'I accept that the question of resurrecting the Ankh-Morpork succession has been raised several times recently,' said Mr Slant.
'Yes. By madmen,' said Mr Boggis. It's part of the symptoms. Put underpants on head, talk to trees, drool, decide that Ankh-Morpork needs a king...'
1
21
3
May 21 '14 edited May 21 '14
[deleted]
3
u/_watching why am i still on reddit May 21 '14
...I was about to link this explanation of neoreactionary thought on the internet because it's really good, but then you said their sidebar was long. This is actually a really interesting rabbit hole to disappear into if you're interested in fringe political thought, but it's a long ass rabbit hole. Here is a much briefer and less-detailed introduction from RationalWiki.
tl;dr - you know the term "reactionary"? Like, people against the Civil Rights movement back in the day were reactionary, because they reacted against progress in race relations? K, neoreactionaries on the internet are basically reactionaries about everything. In a nutshell, they really like pre-Englightenment ideas about things (the best society is a monarchy where we accept that white straight dudes are the only people).
Of course, in blogs and subreddits, there's an overlap between the manosphere neoreactionaries, since the manosphere is basically a reaction against feminism.
2
u/avefelina May 21 '14
This is actually a really interesting rabbit hole to disappear into if you're interested in fringe political thought, but it's a long ass rabbit hole.
It's getting substantially less fringe.
See: Golden Dawn and the Front National
2
u/MedicaeVal May 21 '14
So its basically /r/lewronggeneration taken to the next five levels?
3
u/_watching why am i still on reddit May 21 '14
"omg i was born in the wrong millennium mom just doesnt understand"
1
u/typesoshee May 21 '14 edited May 22 '14
This stuff is fine when it's used in fantasy worlds and RPGs. The real world is not Middle Earth or Zion of the Matrix, thank you.
30
u/DblackRabbit Nicol if you Bolas May 21 '14
It's telling that there header image is something I'm pretty sure is from MtG....which makes me sad that I like MtG.
18
u/jfa1985 Your ass is medium at best btw. May 21 '14
19
u/DblackRabbit Nicol if you Bolas May 21 '14
Its also telling that I'm seen so many MtG cards that I can detect them by art alone.....
11
u/MrZakalwe Hirohito did nothing wrong May 21 '14
This is your gift and your burden to bear.
8
u/steakmeout May 21 '14
It also cost a lot of money - like a degree. Only more useful.
10
u/deviden May 21 '14
Speaking as user of both at various times in my life, many drugs are a cheaper addiction than MTG.
6
May 21 '14
You can always move on to Warmachine - all of the cards, plus the added dorkiness of painting little dudes.
4
u/patfav May 21 '14
Some online "realists" once got extremely mad at me for using an allegory involving white magic mechanics to explain the idea of breaking the symmetry of concepts like equality.
It was pretty amusing. It's one thing to disagree with someone, but to explain your ideas through their favorite hobby is apparently over the line for some of these guys.
4
u/DblackRabbit Nicol if you Bolas May 21 '14
I get almost teethbreaking angry with An Caps and snowcrash. God dammit, how many other mixed hacker protagonist do I have, just give a brother something.
-2
u/Nemester May 21 '14
It is from this tongue in cheek article.
http://radishmag.wordpress.com/2013/05/24/heroes-of-the-dark-enlightenment/
10
u/thousanddaysofautumn May 21 '14
"But muh Dark Triad" Is all I can think of when I see this shit. And since you can't see shit in the dark, we all know this will be just a bastion of discovered knowledge. /all the sarcasm
10
u/Orayn May 21 '14
Dark Enlightenment sounds like a band name that would make me hit "skip" on my power/progressive metal station on Pandora.
19
u/Polkaspots May 21 '14
Is anyone surprised mayonesa posts there? On the upside I've now RES tagged a bunch of racist idiots.
11
9
May 21 '14
At least they've gotten a little more subtle than just calling it /r/niggers.
18
13
u/I_AM_AN_GRAMMAR_NAZI what does it mean May 21 '14
Their sidebar descriptions would make /r/iamverysmart proud.
8
4
May 21 '14
People like this are funny because they freak out when they realize the things they believe don't match up with reality.
13
May 21 '14 edited May 21 '14
[deleted]
27
u/HeartyBeast Did you know that nostalgia was once considered a mental illness May 21 '14
Since black people (African Americans is the appropriate term)
Just to be clear, there are many black people in the world who aren't African Americans.
3
May 21 '14
I knew a white guy who was from Africa and one of his parents was American.
"I have nipples, Greg. Can you milk me?"
-11
May 21 '14
[deleted]
7
May 21 '14
I don't think I understood any of that.
13
u/VasyaFace May 21 '14
I believe /u/Sagemanx is trying to simply say that African American is the preferred term in academic writing.
Why /u/Sagemanx decided to make a travesty of the English language in the attempt, the world will never know.
→ More replies (2)
2
u/Hindu_Wardrobe 1+1=ur gay May 21 '14
Wow, is Blemish actually being the reasonable one here? Holy shit.
2
u/ibbity screw the money, I have rules May 21 '14
I have OP tagged as "redpiller/neonazi apologist." Quel surprise.
4
May 21 '14
[deleted]
18
u/TurtlingTerran May 21 '14
→ More replies (3)13
May 21 '14
Here's an endorsed subscriber posting about it, and commentors directly supporting it.
http://www.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/1qsozw/understanding_the_dark_triad/
This "dark triad" shit is pretty well intermingled with TRP.
-3
u/Nemester May 21 '14
Though your effort is valiant, the dark in both of these terms are coincidental and /r/darkenlightenment is unrelated to dark triad personality. dark enlightenment was coined in this series of posts http://www.thedarkenlightenment.com/the-dark-enlightenment-by-nick-land/
9
u/DblackRabbit Nicol if you Bolas May 21 '14
Its a conglomeration of reactionaries, pick up artists and an cap types....oh what a terrible night for a curse my friend.
2
u/I_AM_AN_GRAMMAR_NAZI what does it mean May 21 '14
Oddly enough, that is a perfect recipe for popcorn.
1
May 21 '14
It looks like the nerdier version of TRP.
2
u/Kytescall May 21 '14
Yes, although TRP is more nerdy than it pretends to be, given how it names itself after a sci-fi movie reference.
2
May 21 '14
Leaving the rest of the mountain of horrible shit aside, I am honestly baffled about how anyone can advocate for monarchy. I have a monarch (albeit one with very limited de facto power) - she seems like a pleasant lady, though I have little idea what her opinion on any given policy would be. I am less keen on her heirs, though, since they don't actually govern me, it's hardly my biggest concern. Supposing, though, that falling out of the correct vagina did qualify some one to rule, do these fine gentlemen suppose they would be getting more of what they want under the absolute rule of King Charles III?
4
u/Nemester May 21 '14
Sounds like they are into some weird stuff:
11
u/DblackRabbit Nicol if you Bolas May 21 '14
Eldars.....fucking Eldars....by the heresy of Horus Eldars?
-6
u/Nemester May 21 '14
These people are crazy. Can you believe they make people swear on darwin's origin of species as an initiation ritual? WTH
5
u/DblackRabbit Nicol if you Bolas May 21 '14
Eldar! They named themselves for the pointy ear bastards that slaughter an entire planet to give one of their own 5 more minutes of life!
7
u/TurtlingTerran May 21 '14
Haha, I think they're self-aware. Nemester is a mod for this subreddit.
7
u/DblackRabbit Nicol if you Bolas May 21 '14
So did we all get wooshed and this is like Anarco-Reactionaries?
-3
u/Nemester May 21 '14
You guys caught it quicker than I would have guessed. Still, I bet there are a few people who read and believe until they scroll down here:
http://occamsrazormag.wordpress.com/2014/02/13/the-dark-enlightenment-exposed/comment-page-1/
9
u/DblackRabbit Nicol if you Bolas May 21 '14
I don't know what to think about this?!
Reality is crashing around me
The cracks sing praises of my dark broken gods.....
-2
2
u/kriddi May 21 '14
Well, seeing as they also like to call them selves Numenors, it's more likely that the Eldar in question are the elves in Lord of the Rings (Link to tolkien website thingy). 40k really likes to steal things ( one of the things I love about the setting).
13
May 21 '14
[deleted]
-10
u/Nemester May 21 '14
; )
8
u/dlogan3344 May 21 '14
It is almost as if you created one big joke and are the one laughing at us... Kudos.
2
u/sooperloopay May 21 '14
http://i.imgur.com/MhlXbA6.jpg this stuff is amazing
3
2
u/Barl0we non-Euclidean Buckaroo Champion May 21 '14
Oh, for fuck's sake...Yet another group to appropriate and misuse the idols of the Scandinavian mythos? At least if I'm reading it correctly.
1
u/totes_meta_bot Tattletale Sep 09 '14
This thread has been linked to from elsewhere on reddit.
If you follow any of the above links, respect the rules of reddit and don't vote or comment. Questions? Abuse? Message me here.
1
u/AnAntichrist May 21 '14
That sub is all kinds of fucked up. Their side bar states that they want no political freedom but somehow everyonell be free because of the magic of capitalism.
1
-10
May 21 '14
[deleted]
16
u/Spreek May 21 '14
On the other hand, I don't think there's a whole lot of evidence pointing the other way (i.e., that there is a measurable genetic difference in intelligence/reasoning between people of different descent).
And because we have neither a completely accurate way to measure intelligence/reasoning nor the knowledge of genetics to prove that the differences are from genes rather than other factors, it's very hard to find evidence to support this idea.
And in practice, these types of conjectures have been quite damaging to society. See for instance "studies" comparing brain size of various races from the 1800s.
-3
u/johnlocke91 May 21 '14
Given that intelligence has a genetic component, it would be extremely unlikely to find out that every race has the exact same distribution of intelligence linked genes.
We do have a lot of (flawed) studies showing that whites have a higher general intelligence than blacks. However, there has been a lot of effort to minimize those flaws and nobody has been able to consistently produce studies showing that blacks and whites have equal general intelligence.
And in practice, these types of conjectures have been quite damaging to society
But in modern day academia, there is strong pressure to say that all races are equal. That studies keep showing differences despite this pressure is evidence in favor of different racial distributions of intelligence.
4
u/Ryuudou May 21 '14 edited May 21 '14
You're actually wrong for the most part. One of the most striking results of the new sequencing studies is how similar humans actually are. We differ from each other only in 0.1% of our DNA. Yet this 0.1% of the genome gives rise to the variations we see between people in traits such as skin color, height, and proclivity for disease.
Whereas in the pre-genomic era one had to work hard to measure genetic variation at a > single locus, now one can consult a readily available public database to get the genetic > variation for thousands of individuals across the entire genome. Most GWAS focus on > single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs): DNA sequence variations that occur at a single > base in the genome (e.g. AAGGCT vs. AAGTCT). Scientists have observed
approximately 12 million SNPs in human populations. This number may seem incredibly large, but there are 6 billion bases in human DNA. So only 0.2% of all DNA bases exhibit any variation across all sampled human populations.There really is no "racial" difference when it comes to intelligence distribution according to the hard data, and if you just mean IQ then things like the Flynn Effect proves how "objective" IQ really is (or isn't). Otherwise we could now deduce that the average female is more intelligent than the average male as female IQ scores have passed males now.
0
u/johnlocke91 May 21 '14
That doesn't contradict what I said at all. What role does that 0.1% of our DNA that differs play in intelligence? Thats the big question. We only differ from chimpanzees by 1%, yet the intelligence difference there is drastic.
There really is no "racial" difference when it comes to intelligence distribution according to the hard data,
Can you cite this hard data?
Most hard data does show a difference in intelligence. Its typically accompanied by an explanation of why the study is flawed, but thats not enough to disprove an idea.
You can't consistently find an intelligence difference, say the studies showing this are flawed, then confidently claim their is no difference. That people keep doing this tells me they are more interested in social justice than the truth.
1
u/Ryuudou May 21 '14
Humans and chimpanzees differ by 5%, and are actually a different race. Humans are not, and differ by an order of magnitude that is 50x times smaller as a result.
Can you cite this hard data?
Yes.
Bond early last century pointed out that the average IQ scores of African Americans from several northern states were higher than those for whites from many southern states (Bond, p. 63). He argued that African Americans who migrated to the North must have left their "duller and less accomplished White fellows in the South." Bond also believed that IQ test scores reflected social and educational training. Inline with this belief, Jenkins's reported the results of IQ tests given to Black and White children in Illinois, and found that the proportion of students with scores over 130 was the same among Black and White children when environmental influences were comparable. A later study, involving Caribbean children, would in essence replicate these findings. The results from that study showed that when raised in the same enriched institutional environments as white children, black children demonstrated superior IQ test scores. IQs were: Black children 108, Mixed children 106, and White children 103 (Tizard et al, 1972).
You can't consistently find contradictions, stick to confirmation bias and half-truths, and then confidently claim "but my biased worldview!". That people keep doing this tells me they're more interested in advancing racist political agenda than the truth.
0
u/johnlocke91 May 21 '14
Do you have anything more recent then 1972? Modern psychology isn't that great, but psychology was still in its infancy at that time and most techniques used to deal with experimental bias were not around yet. Preferably a study in the last 10 years.
2
u/Ryuudou May 22 '14
Psychology has nothing to do with scientific experimental bias. That was not a psychology test. You're grasping hard at straws for finding any excuse to discredit things that don't agree with your preconceived notions (confirmation bias syndrome), but you should at least make an attempt to seem less biased. Ask yourself if you ask these questions when presented with information that supports your white supremism, or if you lap those up without doubting them.
Preferably a study in the last 10 years.
Sure.
Studies also show that upward of 99% of group IQ score differences between healthy black and white Americans are eliminated after controlling for cultural factors. Manly et al (1998) found that after cultural factors such as linguistic behavior (e.g. black vs. standard English) are controlled between healthy black and white Americans that IQ score differences between these populations virtually disappear; becoming insignificant in all but only one area. Some argue that because those who construct standardized tests come from a narrow social group that it follows that test items will contain information and structures that match the background knowledge of some people more than others (Richardson, 2000). This may explain why “acculturation” is found to predict IQ score differences better than virtually any other variable, aside from literacy levels (which is essentially another mediator of culture). Other studies have shown similar results, after controlling for cultural factors. Fagan and Holland (2002) found that where exposure to specific information was required; whites knew more about the meanings of different sayings than did Blacks, due to exposure. But, when comprehension was based on generally available information, Whites and Blacks did not differ (Fagan and Holland, 2002; see also, Fagan and Holland, 2007). This study also found that when Blacks and Whites are matched as to the comprehension of sayings requiring specific knowledge that Blacks were superior to Whites on intelligence tests (ibid).
And
In the United States, when matched for IQ with Whites, American Blacks have been shown to demonstrate superior “Working Memory” (Nijenhuis et al., 2004). This is a particularly interesting finding as African Americans tend to be taught by less qualified teachers (e.g. non-certified teachers and teachers with limited experience) than their white counterparts, and are provided with less challenging school work (Hallinan 1994; Diamond et al., 2004; Uhlenberg and Brown 2004). In Chicago, for example, the vast majority of schools placed on academic probation as part of the district accountability efforts were majority African-American and low-income (Diamond and Spillane 2004). Thus, it is somewhat of a surprise that African Americans should outperform white Americans on any portion of a paper and pencil test designed to mimic the structures of western style schooling and culture (Richardson, 2000, 2002).
I could really go on and on.
1
u/typesoshee May 21 '14
We do have a lot of (flawed) studies showing that whites have a higher general intelligence than blacks.
We also have similar studies showing that Jews and East Asians have a higher general intelligence than other white people. Anyone care to post those studies on that sub to see if that'll shut them up a bit?
I googled "Iq race jews east asian" and the first 4 results show stuff about that.
Let them mull over that. See if they'll stick to their beliefs and get ready to welcome their Chinese monarch overlords.
2
u/BartletForPresident You're a fucking bowl of soup! May 22 '14
In my experience, they do think that Jews are smarter. That is why they think that Jews have taken over all the political, social, and financial institutions they don't like. They also think that Jews are perpetuating liberal ideas among the non-Jewish white population in order to weaken them and therefore stay in power.
They think that Jews are smarter, but they also see us as dangerous, and think that Pogroms, ghettos, and the Holocaust were necessary to keep us from destroying European countries from the inside...or something.
1
u/typesoshee May 22 '14
Ugh. So if their logic isn't "Our world should be run according to who's smartest," is it just "Races should band together and fight for themselves"? Like, "If we're not as smart as Jews, we should persecute them to protect us," and "If we're smarter than blacks, we should take advantage of that and rule them."
-1
u/johnlocke91 May 21 '14
We also have similar studies showing that Jews and East Asians have a higher general intelligence than other white people. Anyone care to post those studies on that sub to see if that'll shut them up a bit?
I would completely agree that Jews and East Asians likely have a higher average intelligence than whites. Jews in particular. Look how many Nobel Prize Winners and professors are Jewish.
-11
May 21 '14
[removed] — view removed comment
16
May 21 '14
I remember you. You got severely ridiculed in SRD, and, TBP, and, somehow, TRP. That's a nice hat trick right there. Remember this amusing dalliance?
Whatcha been up to lately, man?
-5
May 21 '14
[removed] — view removed comment
13
May 21 '14
Cool man, hope you've mellowed out some. You still seem pretty awful based on your recent SRD comments. Objectively speaking.
5
u/superslab Every character you like is trans now. May 21 '14
He's building the master race to fend off Best Korea.
2
-10
May 21 '14
[removed] — view removed comment
7
2
u/HarrietPotter May 21 '14
Yeah, people keep saying that and I don't know why.
Truly, this is one of the great mysteries of our time.
1
May 21 '14
[removed] — view removed comment
2
u/HarrietPotter May 21 '14
At least I don't have a list of enemies like you do.
That's the price of greatness, I'm afraid. You can't make an omelette without breaking a few eggs.
1
May 21 '14
[removed] — view removed comment
2
u/HarrietPotter May 21 '14
Sure, around here we actually call you the Great Boneheaded One. You're like a tourist attraction.
→ More replies (0)-11
1
1
u/CantaloupeCamper OFFICIAL SRS liaison, next meetup is 11pm at the Hilton May 21 '14
A friend had to do some state enforced activity after being a moron and driving drunk.... he had to attend a Madd Impact Panel.... if it wasn't taken I thought that was a great band name.
-20
u/accountt1234isback1 May 21 '14
17
May 21 '14
Sorry people are hurting your feelings by making fun of your bigotry and backwardness.
→ More replies (29)17
May 21 '14
dear you,
please go back to /r/cousinfucking and /r/farmanimalsgw
-15
u/accountt1234isback1 May 21 '14
Dear leftist downvote brigade,
Please go somewhere else, such as /r/pegging.
Thanks.
dear you,
please go back to /r/cousinfucking and /r/farmanimalsgw
Dear fellow intellectual,
Cousinfucking tests those recessive alleles, to see whether they still belong in the gene pool or not. It's survival of the fittest at work.
Farm animal fucking is essential for gay men for whom a normal male penis is no longer satisfying. A horse penis can satisfy them in a way that a normal male human penis can not. For you to oppose farm animal fucking is thus simply an offensive expression of your repressed bigotry.
11
May 21 '14
Cousinfucking tests those recessive alleles, to see whether they still belong in the gene pool or not. It's survival of the fittest at work.
Not so much in our modern society. For instance, even though you received many poor genes from your parents as a result of them being siblings, generous liberals are willing to support your redneck defects and lifestyle.
Farm animal fucking is essential for gay men for whom a normal male penis is no longer satisfying. A horse penis can satisfy them in a way that a normal male human penis can not. For you to oppose farm animal fucking is thus simply an offensive expression of your repressed bigotry.
Actually, gay men statistically have larger penises than straight men, and thus are able to satisfy each other. Most human-animal relations occur as a result of deeply repressed homosexual feelings and penis envy in rural conservatives. Additionally, gay men are wealthier and more educated than small dick conservatives, and thus would not have access to farm animals in the first place.
3
-12
u/accountt1234isback1 May 21 '14
Cousinfucking tests those recessive alleles, to see whether they still belong in the gene pool or not. It's survival of the fittest at work.
Not so much in our modern society. For instance, even though you received many poor genes from your parents as a result of them being siblings, generous liberals are willing to support your redneck defects and lifestyle.
That's not relevant, because those children who inherit a recessive allele twice are more likely to die at birth and otherwise tend not to reproduce. Thus it still works to help clean the gene pool. Feel free to try again.
Farm animal fucking is essential for gay men for whom a normal male penis is no longer satisfying. A horse penis can satisfy them in a way that a normal male human penis can not. For you to oppose farm animal fucking is thus simply an offensive expression of your repressed bigotry.
Actually, gay men statistically have larger penises than straight men, and thus are able to satisfy each other. Most human-animal relations occur as a result of deeply repressed homosexual feelings and penis envy in rural conservatives. Additionally, gay men are wealthier and more educated than small dick conservatives, and thus would not have access to farm animals in the first place.
Repressed homosexual feelings? So you acknowledge that they are in fact homosexual. If you champion the rights of homosexuals, surely you must champion the rights of those homosexual rural conservatives who wish to have sex with a horse because they have no male partners available to them. For you to speak ill of that is simply an expression of your own homophobia.
12
May 21 '14
That's not relevant, because those children who inherit a recessive allele twice are more likely to die at birth and otherwise tend not to reproduce. Thus it still works to help clean the gene pool. Feel free to try again.
Again, this is becoming less and less true. Look at yourself, crippled and made mentally unwell by your family's tradition of incest, yet alive and well supported by healthy Americans. It is unlikely you will reproduce though, I can give you that one. But you always have rape (not legitimate rape, just you know kinda sorta rape) as well as your relatives as options.
Repressed homosexual feelings? So you acknowledge that they are in fact homosexual. If you champion the rights of homosexuals, surely you must champion the rights of those homosexual rural conservatives who wish to have sex with a horse because they have no male partners available to them. For you to speak ill of that is simply an expression of your own homophobia.
No no no, they're not gay, they're straight men who, through the power of Jesus and the free market, manage to fight off the evil desires fueled by Satan and leftist propaganda. Just some mistakes here and there, they're only human.
→ More replies (1)2
u/Hindu_Wardrobe 1+1=ur gay May 21 '14
Awww look, he thinks he's smart! How adorable. Should we feed him? The sign says not to, but he's so cute...
7
u/seedypete A lot of dogs will fuck you without thinking twice May 21 '14
It's adorable that you think you're having a debate here and not just being laughed at by a large crowd of people.
3
1
51
u/Do_not_mod_me May 21 '14
On the brightside, /r/Iamverysmart just got a lot of new material