Its the setting not necessarily the historical accuracy. You have dragons in Game of Thrones but that doesnt mean you can have fighter jets and nuclear bombs, it betrays the setting of the movie
But it's not a real story, it's a fictional one, there aren't mythological monsters in Greece or Turkey. Why does accuracy not matter there but it matters when it comes to the skin colour or someone? Where do we draw the line? Should they be a Greek actor or would a white Scandinavian woman draw the same amount of controversy because I highly doubt they would
Ok cool. Let's set Harry Potter in LA, make the hogwarts castle a single conference room, and you know, just destroy all the aesthetics of it. It's not real, so it's fine.
That's a much bigger change than just changing the skin colour of a character so it's not really a comparable argument but it would also be fine if someone did that, they'd be a bit fucked given they probably don't have the rights to make a Harry Potter story.
14
u/[deleted] 13d ago
[removed] — view removed comment